The evidence

A public finding that changes what a hiring team can responsibly conclude.

The governor study measured whether public sources could be bound to the correct person, office, jurisdiction, and establishable date.

Lead with proof. Publish the finding. Protect the mechanism.

43%Bindable. Fewer than half.
Subjects, the entire population and not a sample50 sitting U.S. governors
Source and subject pairs evaluated3,900
Bound to the right person, office, jurisdiction, and date1,669
Found and real, but not bindable to the subject2,231
Figures inferred0
Cost of the study$97.41

The constant question

Can this source be bound to this person, in this office, in this jurisdiction, at a date that can be established?

That question is simple enough to defend in a room where a decision went wrong. It is also difficult enough that public prominence did not solve it.

Designed for replay

A finding must survive more than a slide.

The study used a complete population rather than a sample. Artifacts were frozen. Every figure traces to a named field, and the assessment frame can be replayed.

Complete population

All fifty sitting governors were included. The finding is not a sample estimate.

Frozen evidence frame

Artifacts and assessment dates establish a consistent frame for re-execution.

Named fields, not narrative inference

Every public figure traces to a measured field rather than a claim written after the fact.

From evidence to enterprise use

See how the finding becomes a defensible read.

The read pairs placement with confidence, carries permitted use, and refuses when the evidence cannot support a result.